13:34

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

Electric Class 700 train unveiled

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 28th January 2014, 23:44
DSY011's Avatar
DSY011 DSY011 is offline  
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BRISTOL U.K.
Posts: 4,464
Images: 547
Electric Class 700 train unveiled

A new train which will "transform" rail travel on one of the country's busiest routes was unveiled today, with pledges of increased reliability and energy efficiency.

http://www.home.bt.com/news/uknews/e...11363871186757

The electric Class 700 is being built for the Thameslink route through London, with the first new trains due to begin operating in 2016.
Siemens is building the 1,140 carriages in Germany, but said up to 2,000 jobs will be created in the UK supply chain, including component manufacturing, maintenance and new depots.


__________________
The Old Git, Syd
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th January 2014, 08:49
pre65's Avatar
pre65 pre65 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ashen-North Essex/Suffolk borders.
Posts: 3,560
Images: 93
The front end looks a bit like the class 70 diesels.
__________________
Philip.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th January 2014, 12:13
boilersuit's Avatar
boilersuit boilersuit is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moved again! Back in Kent!!
Posts: 1,215
Images: 99
What, no end doors? Doesn't look like a very flexible solution. And what about the regulation that trains have to end access if they run through single-bore tunnels?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th January 2014, 17:11
Tony Tony is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Guardamar del Segura, Spain.
Posts: 1,185
Images: 9
With the target being 12 coach trains, how many coaches are in the 700 class ? As Boilersuit points out, no end doors so how do these trains meet multiple working ? Although I am no lover of Bob Crow, I do agree with his comments about these trains; a total Government cock up which lost us a great industry at this time of railway expansion.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29th January 2014, 20:10
bramleyman bramleyman is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 928
Images: 2
I bet the commuters will start ranting and raving about fewer seats as usual?
__________________
I wouldn't say I am old, but when I was a youngster, the Dead Sea was still alive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29th January 2014, 21:19
Beeyar Wunby's Avatar
Beeyar Wunby Beeyar Wunby is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NW Norfolk
Posts: 844
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by boilersuit View Post
What, no end doors? Doesn't look like a very flexible solution.
The DfT specification for these trains was for fixed formation 8 and 12 car trains. They won't be working in multiple.

Quote:
And what about the regulation that trains have to end access if they run through single-bore tunnels?
Throughout the intended route for this stock there are no single bore tunnels.

On the Thameslink side the only cause for this was Smithfield tunnel on the Moorgate Branch (ie, Farringdon to Moorgate). When the branch closed due to the rebuilding of Farringdon station the requirement for end doors on TL rolling stock disappeared.

Over on the GN side there is still one tunnel with significant lengths of single bores - entertainingly enough it's the 'other' Moorgate Line (aka the Northern City Line from Drayton Park to Moorgate) and that uses 313 stock exclusively - so class 700s will not need to be given route clearance down there. The platforms are only 6 cars long anyway.

Last edited by Beeyar Wunby; 29th January 2014 at 21:57.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29th January 2014, 23:41
Timothy Turtle Timothy Turtle is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crawley
Posts: 2
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by boilersuit View Post
What, no end doors? Doesn't look like a very flexible solution. And what about the regulation that trains have to end access if they run through single-bore tunnels?
There is a precedent for running trains with no end doors through single bore tunnels - 395s through Shakespeare Tunnel near Dover (although minor mods to the tunnel and numerous risk assessments were required!)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st February 2014, 16:37
Beeyar Wunby's Avatar
Beeyar Wunby Beeyar Wunby is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NW Norfolk
Posts: 844
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Turtle View Post
There is a precedent for running trains with no end doors through single bore tunnels - 395s through Shakespeare Tunnel near Dover (although minor mods to the tunnel and numerous risk assessments were required!)

It isn't automatically the case that all single-bore tunnels require Emergency End Doors. It is only if the clearance is so limited that passengers are prevented from exiting via the main doors and walking along the tunnel that the requirement is invoked.

Shakespeare Tunnel was modified so that some existing passage ways were converted to be special evacuation points. Therefore it doesn't present the egress risks of a confined single bore tunnel.

This is how the Channel Tunnel manages to operate with single bores - there are regular escape routes formed by cross-passages and refuges .

Also with the new Thameslink Canal Tunnels. Although for part of the route they are single bore, the tunnel diameter is much wider than the train width and the extra space incorporates a raised walkway alongside the train for passenger use in emergencies.

Last edited by Beeyar Wunby; 1st February 2014 at 19:31.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9th February 2014, 20:37
Beeyar Wunby's Avatar
Beeyar Wunby Beeyar Wunby is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NW Norfolk
Posts: 844
Images: 4
Just looking at another website....http://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/7368

The seats look very hard. I don't fancy riding all the way from Peterborough to Brighton on these. Also there are no dividers between carriages. I wonder if this is the case throughout the whole 12 cars. The whole thing looks crude like an underground train.

If this is the case it's a major step down from the 377s currently providing the service.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1390920752_62.254.187.240.jpg (55.8 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg 1390920769_62.254.187.240.jpg (63.0 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg 1390920628_62.254.187.240.jpg (41.9 KB, 11 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:34.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.