05:50

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

class 153's and 156's

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 13th January 2010, 13:59
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by swisstrains View Post
In that case what's your excuse for being miserable and nasty to one of our younger forum members?
Daft questions deserve daft answers?

If I went into a Christian Church and decided to proclaim Islam was a better religon, because I didn't have to spend quite so much money and the holidays were better, I'd get a similar response, from a preist no less.



Last edited by Deathbyteacup; 13th January 2010 at 14:03.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 13th January 2010, 20:00
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Deathbyteacup- If I may say so put the shovel down.
It was in the right area for the kind of traction and such enthusiasm from the younger generation deserves encouragement.
Its not very good for the future if you go and scare them off is it?
Not everyone who comes along to the forum is going to be a swot on rail and may wish to learn.
Please don't compare religious debates to a simple disagreement over railways- thats a bit far even for a die hard enthusiast (or fanatic) like me.
In other words be nice!
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."

Last edited by steam for ever; 13th January 2010 at 20:03. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 13th January 2010, 20:33
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathbyteacup View Post
Daft questions deserve daft answers?

If I went into a Christian Church and decided to proclaim Islam was a better religon, because I didn't have to spend quite so much money and the holidays were better, I'd get a similar response, from a preist no less.
I admit that it could have been better written but the lad asked a perfectly valid and sensible question. Who the hell do you think you are to describe it as "Daft"?
As for using the religious comparison, well, I'm sorry mate but you appear to have lost it. Seek help before it's too late.
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 13th January 2010, 20:57
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathbyteacup View Post
If I went into a Christian Church and decided to proclaim Islam was a better religon, because I didn't have to spend quite so much money and the holidays were better, I'd get a similar response, from a preist no less.
In an ideal world I would hope that a reasoned discussion might take place. I am assuming that neither group included fundamentalists! It is about time the world religions got together to celebrate the beliefs they have in common and take a unified stance against fundamentalism! A naive thought perhaps but why not? Reigious thought over!

My first love is steam but I do believe that DMU's and EMU's are the future of our railways. If the use of 141's keeps a line open then so be it. I would rather travel down a beautiful valley in a 141 than see the line closed. I have traveled on them on the Esk Valley from Middlesbough to Whitby a number of times. I have travel in much worse forms of transport I can tell you!

So folks try and keep things in perspective and be more moderate in your comments.

I will endeavour to do the same!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 14th January 2010, 17:54
Tony Tony is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Guardamar del Segura, Spain.
Posts: 1,185
Images: 9
Six years ago myself, wife and two dogs travelled from Preston to Newton Abott in a 158. I fell out with 158's on that day! The Virgin Voyager had broken down.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 14th January 2010, 19:04
railwaybuddy's Avatar
railwaybuddy railwaybuddy is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: harlow
Posts: 164
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmmick View Post
I cant see the point of building a nice layout and then buying 153s and 156s to run on it
Dont you think its better to have a nice steam loco and coaches i know which i would rather have.

ccmmick.
but the only down side with me is that i have a small layout not much room and the biddest train i can fit on there is a 156 or a 2 car dmu in my station.

but by having lots of them and in different livery it starts to get colourful and bright.

because i have seen some layouts at shows and there is 153, 156, 158 etc etc, and there all the same livery 'northern rail' (i think) it looks rubbish

Last edited by railwaybuddy; 19th January 2010 at 17:26.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 14th January 2010, 19:05
railwaybuddy's Avatar
railwaybuddy railwaybuddy is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: harlow
Posts: 164
Images: 33
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by swisstrains View Post
In that case what's your excuse for being miserable and nasty to one of our younger forum members?
thank you

i like you not that other git
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 14th January 2010, 19:07
railwaybuddy's Avatar
railwaybuddy railwaybuddy is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: harlow
Posts: 164
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmmick View Post
I am sorry railwaybuddy

I didnt realise that you are one of our younger members if 153s and 156s make you happy then good on you.

ccmmick.
no no dont worry

i like to here your views on what you think about them
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 14th January 2010, 19:11
Dave Rowland's Avatar
Dave Rowland Dave Rowland is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gosport, Hants
Posts: 1,064
Images: 45
It's YOUR layout, Railwaybuddy, run whatever you want, and don't take any notice of what us old farts would like on OUR railways! I haven't got anywhere near enough room for even a tiny layout in my one-bedroom flat, but I HAVE got a GWR 14xx 0-4-2T adorning my bookcase and a little LNER 4472 'Flying Scotsman' on the mantlepiece!

Last edited by Dave Rowland; 14th January 2010 at 19:14. Reason: spilling mistoke
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 14th January 2010, 19:13
railwaybuddy's Avatar
railwaybuddy railwaybuddy is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: harlow
Posts: 164
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Rowland View Post
Rebuilt from 155's SFE - a bit more luxurious than the awful 150's (some drivers refer to 150's as 'Burger Vans'!)
i was not 155 (some were (only the prototypes))

it was the 156

because if you look at a 156 it has a large cab then a small corridor conector which gets turned in to a cab

156=2'153's
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.