14:56

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Freight Operations and Observations

End of the line for EWS?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #101  
Old 4th March 2010, 07:10
Intermodalist Intermodalist is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 6
I can understand why the B Fan are seen as redundant, as they have always been a bit of design weakness of the yard.

But I struggle to understand why the C Fan tracks are seen as more valuable than the reception sidings adjacent to the mainline.

Looking at an aerial photo, the C Fan tracks are only around 450m in length. Surely if one is wear a cost-cutting hat one would abandon Fan C in favour of the seven Fan A rception tracks, which are 750m-plus in length.


Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 5th March 2010, 18:13
33056 33056 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: On a train somewhere in Europe
Posts: 52
Images: 3
Don't know which train crew you have been speaking to; C fan doesn't have 8 tracks, only five (six if you include B8) and one of those is out of use at one end! Also A fan only has five roads as well and one of those is out of use at the south end.

Most likely outcome is to concentrate remaining trains on the Reception roads of which there are seven, fully track circuited and signalled.

B Fan is quite useful for doing repairs and suchlike, especially as much of it does not have OHL to complicate matters.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 5th March 2010, 21:08
Seabrook Seabrook is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East London
Posts: 101
Thank-you 33056; regarding the actual number of roads in Wembley EFOC I stand corrected. However what might seem as common sense to you will not necessarily be the action DBS take. The only update I can give is, it is the intention to only use 3 roads in 'C Fan'.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 8th March 2010, 16:54
Intermodalist Intermodalist is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 6
I must say, the only only logical rationalisation seems to be a retraction back to using just the reception roads. After all, DBS still needs the capability to 'hold' Channel Tunnel trains, and, therefore, I'm sure the company will indeed carry on using these 750m-plus tracks in preference over the shorter Fan C tracks.

If the Fan C tracks do fall out of use, I'm not sure this ought to be seen as any major loss.

A more worrying development is the moth-balling of the Trafford Park terminal. Is DBS is not able to drum up enough Channel Tunnel traffic from the Manchester area then things must be bad.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 9th March 2010, 09:34
The Crab The Crab is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 62
I very rarely travel by train nowadays so I often see big changes between trips. A recent weekday journey from Dundee to Sheffield produced just three freight trains on the 300-odd mile route including areas of heavy industry. Should the question be "End of the line for freight?"
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 10th March 2010, 10:03
Intermodalist Intermodalist is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 6
No, it's not the end of the line for freight.

In terms of intermodal trains carrying shipping containers to and from British ports, they will always exist and will rise in number as world trade grows again.

In terms of intermodal trains carrying European swap bodies and containers, be that traffic via the Channel Tunnel or via the East Coast ports, these will carry on running so long as the costs of running them do not rise to a prohibitive level - cost has historically been the major barrier to growth for these services.

In terms of trains carry bulk products by the train-load, these will carry on running.

Also, I expect the tiny number of wagon-load trains to carry on running along the same core network that exists now, bolstered by the continuance of MOD traffic.

The reason why you did not see many freight trains during your journey between Dundee and Sheffield is not because the railway is failing in any way. If you want to see large numbers of freights, many of which running one after the other, pop down to southern section of the WCML.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 11th March 2010, 09:11
The Crab The Crab is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 62
I hope that you are right, I'm sure you are when it comes to container traffic - I sometimes work next to the main line at Romford & there are always plenty of containers passing. When I moved to Sheffield in 1980 I often got the Master Cutler to London and freight trains would be literally nose to tail on the goods lines from Tapton Jct (Chesterfield) to Clay Cross. On a similar journey today I would guess that you might see one freight all the way to St Pancras. I didn't know that any wagonload stuff still ran - do you have any details?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 12th March 2010, 00:07
Max Webster Max Webster is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cheltenham, Glos
Posts: 18
Regarding Wembley, I read in one of the railway magazines that much of its Enterprise/wagonload work is transferring to Didcot. Does this imply that these services are to be integrated more with the MoD network (Didcot being a hub for this)? Also read that Trafford Park's traffic is transferring to Wakefield Europort, as the latter has 'better transport links'. As for money wasted on under-used/unused freight infrastructure, a prime example must be the new terminals built for the Royal Mail traffic, most of which can only have seen a couple of years work. At the other end of the scale would be the siding built at Kyle of Lochalsh for wagonload freight - did it ever generate any? And what has become of the new terminal in Portsmouth - I haven't read of anything out of there yet.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 12th March 2010, 06:35
LesG's Avatar
LesG LesG is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Keith, NE Scotland
Posts: 284
Images: 28
. At the other end of the scale would be the siding built at Kyle of Lochalsh for wagonload freight - did it ever generate any?

Not in the last 11 years!

Les
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 23rd April 2010, 00:26
HM181's Avatar
HM181 HM181 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Mill
Posts: 329
Images: 26
I am ex BR and also worked for EWS from day 1.
As a trade union rep at National Level and also at my depot I have worked with company directors and local managers.
The whole management culture on EWS revolves around bully boy tactics from all levels of the management strata.
They do not care about certain sections of staff, and thier MO is to reduce staffing levels at all costs, using any means at thier disposal.
This includes implimenting work rosters, ignoring local agreements made under the Partneship Agreements.
The managers will lie and cheat in thier dealings with staff, and cannot be trusted in any way shape or form.
We had an MD from Canada, and now he has gone home, in my view thats the best place for him.
I am glad that I took the money when I did, cos that brass is better in my pocket then in EWS's pocket.
This is my opinion on this company but is bourne out all over the system when you talk to other staff.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.