11:27

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Light Rail and Metros

Track Circuits (rural, mainline, metro)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 8th April 2008, 20:15
Shed Cat's Avatar
Shed Cat Shed Cat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 1,100
Images: 46
I would rule out mobile phones, but there is an awful lot of other intermitent airbourne RF noise from other transmitters. Emergency services radio transmitters are very powerful for example.

What about broad spectrum RF noise from sparking? either from OHLE, or from good old 750V third rail.



*****


Possbly a bit off topic for a undergrad project, but the "lateral thinking" apprach would say "why fight the noise?" Why not [electronically] look for a distinctive traction motor noise as the signal you are trying to detect, rather than eliminate



Last edited by Shed Cat; 8th April 2008 at 20:20.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 31st December 2008, 12:29
SDX SDX is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 21
Hello, and "bon courage" for your project!

The current track-circuit systems vary according to the status of the line: electrified or not, 750 V DC 3rd rail (ex Network SouthEast and various metros); 1500 V DC usually overhead (France, Netherlands); 3kV DC (Belgium...);15 kV 16,66 Hz (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) and 25 kV 50 Hz (England, France...).

Usually, over non electrified lines, or DC electrified lines, 50Hz track circuit was used.

With AC electrification, systems have evolved to higher frequencies, of course off the harmonics of the traction current. More recent systems use periodic impulsions of high frequency (something like three impulsions at ~150Hz every second), process which proved to be efficient short sections of rail in dirty environment (leaves, oil...) especially in station areas.

Coming back to your solution, you mentionned a number of external sources of noise. DC usually does not create noise, provided that it is properly filtered in the substation, but DC trains are now equiped with thyristors which "cut" periodically the current in order to deliver the adequate power to the motors. The frequency they cut is around 400 Hz and is perfectly audible on recent trains (jubilee line for instance). Your system will have to avoid these frequencies.

Last question: if you process the signal on the reception side, how long will the process take, and how long is the free distance that it will represent ?

Good luck! (In case your project is not yet done, which I -now- doubt, according to the date of the former posts!!)

Last edited by SDX; 31st December 2008 at 12:40. Reason: Is this topic still relevant?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 31st December 2008, 14:15
Flying Pig Flying Pig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gone
Posts: 322
Images: 3
Hi SDX, thanks for some intersting info there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdx
but DC trains are now equiped with thyristors which "cut" periodically the current in order to deliver the adequate power to the motors. The frequency they cut is around 400 Hz and is perfectly audible on recent trains (jubilee line for instance). Your system will have to avoid these frequencies.
In the UK, the last couple of generations of 750 V DC mainline EMUs have used AC motors. This started with 465/466 Networkers in the 1980s , and has been continued with the more recent 375/376/377/378 series. The main benefit of this is that the motors can be used for dynamic (regenerative) braking. This not only saves on brake disc usage and is a more 'powerful' brake, but also keeps the Green lobby happy as it enables some of the train's kinetic energy to put back into the Traction Current supply, or even the National Grid theoretically.

Because the motor frequency varies as a function of train speed, some units like 465/2 and 466 (ie, the MetCam units) have a device called an Interference Monitor, which will actually cut off traction power if the train's return current contains a frequency near to 50Hz into the running rails - which I'm told is to prevent damage to the ac track circuit.

And it's not just EMUs; Diesel locos are undergoing similar development. The ubiquitous Class 66 loco was conceived with DC traction motors, but the new Genesis Project hybrid loco (powered byboth Diesel & AC) which GE is currently developing for Freightliner is to have AC traction motors.

Last edited by Flying Pig; 31st December 2008 at 16:31. Reason: added more info
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 31st December 2008, 20:57
SDX SDX is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 21
Hello, and thank you for your comments. As far as I know, there are in France some areas where using "récupération" (i.e. producing and sending it back to the over-head line) is forbidden due to incompatibility with track-circuit. So, either they use the rehostatic braking (dissipating energy through resistors) or use engines without this feature!
The idea is, on the long term, to modify track-circuit in order to protect them from these effects.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.