06:38

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Narrow Gauge

Leek and Manifold.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 3rd December 2010, 19:17
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Leek and Manifold.

The leek and Manifold can be compared to the Welsh highland railway on a number of points;
Spectacular scenery
Unique locos and stock
was linked to standard gauge line.

On more unique points;
It carried standard gauge waggons
It was big four owned during it's later years
It was the subject of a failed revival project.

Thing is, at the time of the heritage proposal in the 1970s the local vote was 98% supportive, but congestion would have become an even bigger local problem. what has changed since then? A lot. Moorland and city railways have reopened the Cauldon lowe line, which has a lifted spur to Waterhouses, where the Leek and Manifold began. The spur is only very short and would give passengers a destination away from the freight terminal. With a rail link on the doorstep, there would seem very little from stopping the narrow gauge line from reopening. Ok, it would cost a huge amount of money, but the trackbed is unobstructed, and the path could be relocated to the side. Who would pay for it?

I must make it clear that Moorland and city railways is not a heritage railway and its primary reason for being is heavey freight, which is a big source of income. The Churnet valley railway is shorter, but a southern extension will take it to Alton towers, so need I say more?

this little line could Flourish in the same styal as the Welsh Highland, and would join the elite group of big four narrow gauge lines.
Others being Lynton and Barnstaple, Corris railway, Vale of Rheidol railway, Welshpool and Llanfair railway etc.

Slightly off topic, but the Churnet valley and Moorland and city railways share some directors and so are very close, and also physically linked. It is my belief that a great deal more success could be had by properly joining the two into one company that would be aptly named.

NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE RAILWAY

The money is there and waiting, so why not just one more attraction?


__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 3rd December 2010, 22:41
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Sorry SFE, don't see the Leek and Manifold making it back. I don't think you can really compare it with the Welsh Highland. The WHR links three important tourist centres and hopefully will take traffic off busy but narrow roads. It has the ability to move large numbers of people.

Nowhere near the same number of people visit The Manifold Valley and the track bed is now the road up the valley. Nice dream but probably not going to happen. But one should never say never in preservation!

Best wishes,

John H-T,
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th December 2010, 07:45
Madcaravanner's Avatar
Madcaravanner Madcaravanner is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 977
Images: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by John H-T View Post
Sorry SFE, don't see the Leek and Manifold making it back. I don't think you can really compare it with the Welsh Highland. The WHR links three important tourist centres and hopefully will take traffic off busy but narrow roads. It has the ability to move large numbers of people.

Nowhere near the same number of people visit The Manifold Valley and the track bed is now the road up the valley. Nice dream but probably not going to happen. But one should never say never in preservation!

Best wishes,

John H-T,
I agree with John H-T I can't see the locals now being in favour this being rebuilt I think you will get far too many NIMBY's now no matter how attractive we as railway enthusiasts think it will be.


I think your proposal re the North Staffs Railway is far more likely
__________________
Regards
Gray
The wheelchair Paparazzi

https://www.flickr.com/gp/grays_photos/6P1643
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th December 2010, 16:11
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Well it's always a shame, but I still think that the Moorland and City Waterhouses link should be reinstated. Cauldon Lowe is a tiny place, and Waterhouses has more substance to it.
I don't really see what the NIMBY's have a problem with, but then again, I'm an enthusiast, so berhaps I'm biased there. The welsh Highland also met stiff opposition too, although the trackbed was relatively untoutched.
I agree that the Manifold are is not as popular, but the point of these railways is to bring extra visitors in. The welsh highland cannor really be called either a preserved railway or a heritage railway, but instead a tourist railway. They might not agree with that down at Harbour station however.
When moorland and city start oporating a full service in the area visitor numbers will probably grow substantially. The Lynton and Barnstaple is an example that shares a lot with the L&M. It was sold off in many lots, and parts are now small roads and farmland and paths. They doo however have a good mile of services running and are gradually getting there, with replica locos and track extensions.
To start with they had a surviving station, Woody Bay.

The L&M also has a surviving station, its terminus Hulme end, where there is also the loco shed and signal box. A bid of demo track here would at least make a good museum out of what is left.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th December 2010, 22:10
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
The was some good film of the Leek and Manifold on Countryfile (BBC1) last night. Reminded me what a beautiful valley the Manifold is. Might just be one of the NIMBYs against reinstating the railway!

Your idea of a little cameo at Hulme could be a good idea, but I am not keen on the idea of crowds in every valley! If we are not careful someone will want to build a cable car up to Thor's Cave!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7th December 2010, 14:41
Midland Compound's Avatar
Midland Compound Midland Compound is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Crewe
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
The leek and Manifold can be compared to the Welsh highland railway on a number of points;
Spectacular scenery
Unique locos and stock
was linked to standard gauge line.
not to mention both of them being hopelessly uneconomic to run !
__________________
"If God had meant us to fly, he would never have given us the railways" Micheal Flanders
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th December 2010, 19:36
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
The WHR is currently not that economicals I will grant you that, and that appears to be partly because of the tramway section in Porthmadog and space at Harbour station, which still has only one platform and trains have to reverse in. The WHR would do a lot better if they forgot their differences with the 1964 company and ran into their station opposite the national rail Porthmadog station, which would ease things considerably. Beddgelert shuttle trains from the 1964 company station would be a great boost, and the current parctice of terminating most trains just outside Porthmadog simply cannot last. With a few tactical changes here and there things could get better. For example. Using FR loading gauge stock and a double Fairlie to run through trains from Carnarfon to Blaenau Ffestiniog would cut the Congestion by a lot.
The leek and Manifold was not a network of lines like the FR/WHR/WHHR currently is and was an end to end line. Therefore there would be less operational difficulties.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8th December 2010, 22:57
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
SFE, there's an article in the new edition of Steam Railway which will tell you just which of those "tactical changes" they are intending to make, you may be pleasantly suprised when you read it.

Regards, 62440,
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9th December 2010, 16:33
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Thanks 62440. I'll get it on saturday, by all accounts a fine publication.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10th December 2010, 12:28
richard thompson richard thompson is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 858
Images: 18
Just watched last Sunday`s Countryfile. Quite a bit was in the mannifold valley with a little archive film- showed what has been lost.
Richard

Last edited by richard thompson; 10th December 2010 at 12:30.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.