06:20

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

40126

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 7th February 2011, 07:10
48111 48111 is offline  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 414
Well all this talk about the engine being a bad luck engine or whatever, with all my years on the railway, an engine or loco was an engine, it was allocated and worked, we certainly never bothered about or even thought about what its history was, I think a lot of this comes from the "outside" and not from working railwaymen.
There was a few engines on BR that were involved in a lot more serious incidents than the great train robbery, but they went into works and came back out and worked until the end, we as drivers and firemen or secondmen never give "what has happened to the engine before" a thought. As I say I think that came from Anoraks and people outside of the working railway.

I still think that Jack Mills Should have been recognised in some way though.

RIP Jack mate.

48111


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 7th February 2011, 16:23
ccmmick's Avatar
ccmmick ccmmick is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St Austell
Posts: 1,109
Images: 71
I think it was a great shame that Jack Mills died soon after the great train robbery and it should never have happened, Bruce Reynolds said from the start no guns and no violence if the driver they had got knew how to drive the type of loco then then no doubt Jack Mills would not have died.
We had a driver at St Blazey John William Elliot who was killed on a class 37 the 24/12/1993 in the shed, the one good thing he did not know what happened it was over that quick. I cant remember the number of the loco i think it was a 376?? and we all said after his death we didn't want to see the loco again it went upto Scotland to finish it's days.
37412 was named after him by his daughter in 1994 Driver John Elliot.

ccmmick.
__________________
Sometimes i think to myself
I dont know and other times
I dont know what to think

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30th July 2012, 12:05
brianrob1961 brianrob1961 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by 48111 View Post
Well I have NEVER heard anything about 40126, even when I was at work.

In fact as far as I know, and I could be wrong, but it has never been made WIDE knowledge that 40126 was the actual engine on the train, It was certainly never spoken about in our Cabin and I cannot honestly remember it being the topic in other cabins, certainly not when I was in them.

48111
I worked on 40126 several times as a Secondman and it was common knowledge among loco crews that this was the G.T.R. engine.

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30th July 2012, 16:38
Belmont Road's Avatar
Belmont Road Belmont Road is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: cowes
Posts: 391
Images: 31
Apparently the loco in the Tay Bridge Disaster - which was recovered after the accident and repaired, was considered unlucky (was known as the diver) and drivers refused to work her over the new bridge.

The taboo was eventually broken some years later.

Perhaps someone can provide more details
__________________
Great Central Jack
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30th July 2012, 19:29
keith morgan keith morgan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stafford (ex-wolverhampton)
Posts: 277
D326 was a regular visitor at Bushbury (3B), during the early sixties, she would come down on the Euston - Wolverhampton then return the next morning on the 6.40 am Euston. It was always mentioned by footplate crew's that she was the train robbery engine, i also heard that she gathered a little bit of a reputation as an unlucky engine having been involved in a couple of incidents ---- i'm sure what they were.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 3rd August 2012, 00:32
NYM's Avatar
NYM NYM is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: By the frozen stream where the alligators swim
Posts: 24
Images: 93
40126 was well known as being the loco involved in the crime. As a teenager I knew about it. It was given priority for scrapping after it's withdrawal, iirc.

Also, when a TV programme or maybe a film was made about it, 40106 was used in filming.
__________________
In the pantomime of life, I'm behind you.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12th August 2012, 10:02
ACE's Avatar
ACE ACE is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Penzance,Cornwall
Posts: 469
Images: 1350
Remember the reporting in 'Rail Enthusiast' at the time of 40126's 'demise', like most have said on here, it was the correct decision to scrap it ASAP, once it finished in BR service
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 7th October 2012, 20:24
astrase2 astrase2 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Morayshire
Posts: 3
I have received a batch of Graham Farish locos from a friend and 40 126 is amongst them. He wanted a split head code version because he liked the look of it and chose the number through no special significance. The loco was numbered D326 at the time of the robbery and appears to have had a very checkered career. Some more information here.
http://www.railblue.com/pages/Class%....DN.010484.htm

Last edited by astrase2; 7th October 2012 at 20:53.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 7th October 2012, 20:52
astrase2 astrase2 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Morayshire
Posts: 3
I can understand to a degree, the resentment that would have been created at having 40 126 preserved or made as a model but why then is a mail coach from the robbery on display at the Severn Valley Railway, Bridgnorth?

Last edited by astrase2; 8th October 2012 at 20:06.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 8th October 2012, 00:35
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
40 106 WAS used, in the film "Buster", the exterior railway scenes were mostly filmed on the G.C.R. where 40 106 was based at the time, mock up headcode boxes were fitted.

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.