00:06

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

Northern rail services.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 15th January 2010, 21:19
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
If I am honest over the past week they look like they go through a pond!
They smell like one too.


__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15th January 2010, 22:56
pavorossi pavorossi is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,651
Images: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
They smell like one too.
I must say that you're right, a lot of the Northern stock has quite a pong to it. All of there 144s have the same musty smell to them, as do some of the 142s. I'd much rather have a nice TPE 185!
__________________
Adam
East Lancs TTI
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16th January 2010, 12:01
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Its a shame that Northern are trying to hang on to their pacer classes and the 142 in particular simply cannot cope with passenger numbers on the modern railway.
They were designed at a time when passenger numbers were at their lowest and expected to keep on falling.
Now the railways are the busiest ever and we need something else.
I actually secretly quite like pacers as they have that colonel Stephens feel about them but there is a point when it gets too bad.
Earlier in the year I saw one still in merseyrail livery but the corner of the cab had been smashed in probably by an accident at the yard but it was still in service with a bit of masking tape holding the light in place. Surely that is beyond unsafe and should never have been shoved into service.
Their 158s often have bits falling off as those in other companies are refurbished.

If in hell there were a railway then it would be operated by Northern.
They should use that I think.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16th January 2010, 18:44
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Just thinking about the Middlewich branch from Northwich.
This is a journey I would like to do if passenger services are reinstated but I do wish they would hurry up about it.
Mid cheshire rail users association want the line open to passengers. To be honset here I think they wouild do a grand job running it themselves as they have some good ideas and are actually interested in the passenger.
They could by a pacer off Northern for about 20p and do it up. Thats all they are worth by now.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16th January 2010, 20:42
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
Actually SFE, Northern lease their rolling stock, the Pacers are leased from Angel Trains according to my book. (Do I remember Angel Trains being taken over by a bank or somesuch?)

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17th January 2010, 19:14
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Are those the ex First pacers?
I am pretty sure that the ex arriva ones are owned by Northern as Arriva managed to refurbish them with their won fittings.
So did Merseyrail and to a greater extent.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17th January 2010, 20:06
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
All of the class 142 vehicles are listed in the Platform 5 combined editions 2008, 2002, & 1998 as being owned by Angel Trains. I don't know of any (passenger) train operating company who actually "own" the rolling stock they use, all of it went to the three leasing companies at privatisation. All the class 143 and 144's are owned by Porterbrook except for about 6 or seven which are owned by various local authorities in South Wales. I don't know the lease details but presumably there would be scope for the operators to do "Re-furbs" to their own spec written into the agreements.

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 18th January 2010, 11:20
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
About 10 years ago my grandfather said "its the line where trains go to die"
Its true now and to a much worse extent.
Yes since Northern took over there haven't been any 158s or 175s on peak time services, unlike under First North Western.

Quote:
A while back there was talk of a second line to Manchester airport between Hale and Ashley and would have been a nice trip.
If Metrolink fails in its plans to go to the Airport then this might be revived.
In one of the Network Rail documents that's been produced it mentions it as a possible future proposal for between 2014 and 2019: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%...st%20Urban.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 18th January 2010, 11:27
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
Just thinking about the Middlewich branch from Northwich.
This is a journey I would like to do if passenger services are reinstated but I do wish they would hurry up about it.
Mid cheshire rail users association want the line open to passengers. To be honset here I think they wouild do a grand job running it themselves as they have some good ideas and are actually interested in the passenger.
Yes a feasability report in the reopening of that line found the benefit:cost ratio is 5:1. Also if GMPTE looked at reopening Cheadle and Baguley stations then it should be feasible to run a Crewe-Altrincham-Manchester service, giving Northwich, Knutsford and Hale a half-hourly Manchester service.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 19th January 2010, 12:29
Belmont Road's Avatar
Belmont Road Belmont Road is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: cowes
Posts: 391
Images: 31
Have to agree with this, travelled back from Gainsborough on Sunday, the pacer was in a disgraceful condition lights not working, the train was 40 minutes late, no information point on the station had to use my mobile to find out the delay, station was infested with rats running around on the platforms.

I shall be seeking compensation from Northern as the dalay caused me to miss a connecting train at Lincoln and I was over two hours late eventually. More people ought to use the complaint system,it looks bad on their performance data and they can be bought to book by the regulator - we put up with too much.
__________________
Great Central Jack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.