03:03

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > News and General Discussion > Railway News from around the World

Taxi trips for drivers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 29th February 2008, 20:59
DSY011's Avatar
DSY011 DSY011 is offline  
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BRISTOL U.K.
Posts: 4,464
Images: 547
I can understand a taxi within a city or 20 or so miles, but my point is a 4 hour trip of 200 miles is unacceptable. I have also been put on a taxi when my train arrived late and I missed my connection, but that was as a passenger not someone who was about to take a train out and travel at 100 + MPH with a lot of passengers onboard.


__________________
The Old Git, Syd
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd March 2008, 00:44
Dynamo's Avatar
Dynamo Dynamo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 246
Images: 20
I work for EWS and we use taxi's all the time. Usually on local trips of just a few miles, but I have been in a taxi all the way to Healey Mills Yard and Rotherham from Tees quite a lot. The longest taxi ride I've had was from Toton near Nottingham to Tees, but that was cos I'd got there too late to catch the last train home.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 6th March 2008, 13:13
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
The reason I mentioned Manchester Victoria to Manchester Piccadilly is because a taxi is probably 3 times the charge of a tram. Maybe a taxi should be used in an emergency if staff need to quickly transfer between stations. However, most of the time I wouldn't think it matters.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 7th March 2008, 13:46
John_142's Avatar
John_142 John_142 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 587
Images: 44
Would have thoght it would be quicker on the tram with all the traffic arround !
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10th March 2008, 13:16
pavorossi pavorossi is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,651
Images: 69
It would depend on how long you had to wait for a tram. I've had to wait half an hour at he most, so in those circumstances it'd be quicker to get a taxi. However, ther are times when you don't have to wait at all.
__________________
Adam
East Lancs TTI
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10th March 2008, 15:48
LesG's Avatar
LesG LesG is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Keith, NE Scotland
Posts: 284
Images: 28
It's all well and good saying that drivers should try and take public transport instead of taxis,

What most people don't realise is the amount of kit a driver is supposed to carry around with him/her, let me tell you that it can weigh what feels like a ton when you have to carry it for a distance.

Les
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12th March 2008, 12:48
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by pavorossi View Post
It would depend on how long you had to wait for a tram. I've had to wait half an hour at he most, so in those circumstances it'd be quicker to get a taxi. However, ther are times when you don't have to wait at all.
There should be a tram between Victoria and Piccadilly every 12 minutes. However, most conductors would be capable of walking between St. Peters Square and Piccadilly (trams between Victoria and St. Peters Square should be every 6 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12th March 2008, 13:01
locojoe's Avatar
locojoe locojoe is offline  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London England
Posts: 951
Images: 47
Why don't rail companys buy cars and employ their own drivers instead of using taxis, or would that be more expensive than hiring taxis.
__________________
locojoe
When I read about the evils of drink I gave up reading
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12th March 2008, 13:12
DSY011's Avatar
DSY011 DSY011 is offline  
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BRISTOL U.K.
Posts: 4,464
Images: 547
It would cost far too much. Think of the running costs, then you would need three drivers plus some extra ones to cover days off, sick. holidays, hangovers etc. You would also need more than one car so as to cover servicing, breakdowns, accidents and two cars may be needed at the same time going to diffrent places. No a taxi or public transport is far cheaper.
__________________
The Old Git, Syd
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12th March 2008, 13:18
locojoe's Avatar
locojoe locojoe is offline  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London England
Posts: 951
Images: 47
Hi Syd but are cheaper options always the best.
__________________
locojoe
When I read about the evils of drink I gave up reading
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.