15:14

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

class 60 s

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 27th May 2010, 13:53
class9 class9 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike-the-trainman View Post
Hi The 60,s are a powerful Locomotive they had afew reliablity problems when they where new but settled down over the years .Ideal for large coal trains ,container train etc. cant understand why they have been sidelined especialy when they are not that old. thankyou Mike
These locos would have been a lot more reliable had EWS maintained them properly.
As for container trains, they are not suitable, having a max speed of 60mph, container trains run as class 4, 75mph.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27th May 2010, 14:00
48111 48111 is offline  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 414
Well it seems to me that a "Lott A Lotta" money is being wasted somewhere within the modern railway !!!

But perhaps it is just me.

48111
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27th May 2010, 14:08
pre65's Avatar
pre65 pre65 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ashen-North Essex/Suffolk borders.
Posts: 3,557
Images: 93
So, if a class 60 has a max speed of 60mph, are they geared down for increased tractive effort ?

Is that why they are more powerful (in terms of freight tons hauled) than the more common class 66 ?
__________________
Philip.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31st May 2010, 21:13
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
From my spotting book:-

Class 60. Max. T.E. 500 kN (106500 lbf)
Continuous T.E. 336 kN (71570 lbf @ 17.4 mph)

Class 66. Max. T.E. 409 kN (92000 lbf)
Con. T.E. 260 kN (58390 lbf @15.9 mph.)
Class 66/6 Max. T.E. 467 kN (105080 lbf)
Con. T.E. 296 kN (66630 lbf @ 14.0 mph)

Hope this helps.

Regards. 62440.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 4th July 2010, 12:17
mickey1852000 mickey1852000 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northwest
Posts: 16
60074 has spent the last fortnight on driver refresher between carlisle/ Dumfries and Falkland yard, so perhaps there is still hope for the tugs yet
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 4th July 2010, 13:49
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
60074 is the usual on the mid cheshire line. I was wondering where it went. Why they chose this engine is beyond me as there are plenty of others stored. This one was busy being useful. Now all I've got is a grubby 66 to look at.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 5th July 2010, 21:13
Dynamo's Avatar
Dynamo Dynamo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 246
Images: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by pre65 View Post
So, if a class 60 has a max speed of 60mph, are they geared down for increased tractive effort ?

Is that why they are more powerful (in terms of freight tons hauled) than the more common class 66 ?

I've heard that gearing the Class 60's at 60MPH was a political decision within BR. At the time, BR knew they wanted a new freight loco and they went to all the different freight sections to ask them to help pay for it. All the different sections agreed to help foot the bill except Freightliner, but the other sections figured that Freightliner would still make use of the loco's even if they didn't help to pay for them. To make it unviable for Freightliner to use the 60's, they geared them to run at just 60MPH because they knew that all Freightliner trains were booked to run at 75MPH.

Yes to your second question though. The lower gearing is the reason why they can pull heavier loads.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.