23:47

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Narrow Gauge

Launceston Steam Railway Future in Jeopardy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 7th September 2012, 11:15
penrose penrose is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 7
Launceston Steam Railway Future in Jeopardy

Statement currently being circulated by the LSR - do support us if you can (and many thanks to those who have already done so):

For many years the LSR has set its sights on the final extension of the railway to the small village of Egloskerry, two miles further on from the present terminus at Newmills. To this end, more than a decade ago we purchased the final section of trackbed required at the Egloskerry end.

Some three years ago, the railway was approached by Cornwall Council with a proposal to enable the railway’s extension to Egloskerry in conjunction with the creation of an off-road multi-use trail between Launceston and Egloskerry. Cornwall Council succeeded in their bid for funding from the South West Regional Development Agency for this project, together with projects at Bude and Caradon Hill. The railway agreed to fund the cost of track laying and materials, whilst the project would fund the other elements.

Last year however, Cornwall Council decided it could no longer fund the railway’s extension, but would nonetheless ensure that the trail was constructed in such a way as to ensure that the route of a future railway extension was not compromised in any way.

Following a review earlier this year by the funders (now taken over by DEFRA) concerned over lack of progress overall, the Bude project and the Launceston to Polson Bridge section were cancelled. Under considerable pressure and the threat of withdrawal of funding, Cornwall Council decided to push ahead with a much reduced scheme in an attempt to meet the closely monitored deadline for completion and have applied for planning permission for a multi-use trail which involves almost half of the trail being on-road, and the section between Newmills and our trackbed at Egloskerry (where the trail once again takes to the road) being constructed down the centre of the trackbed! If approved, this would forever prevent any possibility of the railway extending its business to Egloskerry our ultimate destination and would also cut us off from the trackbed we already own at Egloskerry.

Already a number of local people have registered objections - not least because we are the town’s major tourist attraction - but any person can comment on planning applications, and we are hoping that as many as possible will support us and the landowners in objecting to the current plan.

The planning application can be viewed at http://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/onli...=M8WK1DFG0H900 (or by entering the application number PA12/07870 in the Cornwall Council online planning website) and comments can be made by selecting the comments tab. Alternatively you can sign a petition of objection to the application at www.ipetitions.com/petition/lsr/

Further information may also be found on the ‘News’ and ‘TRAC Project’ pages of the LSR website (www.launcestonsr.co.uk).

We would be most grateful for whatever help you are able to give. All we are asking for is for Cornwall Council to change their plans so that rail and trail can share the route.

Many thanks for taking the time to read this.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th September 2012, 14:29
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
I feel that it is important to support the Launceston Steam Railway by supporting the petition. The railway is an important base and tourist attraction.

Best wishes,

John H-T.
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th September 2012, 20:11
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
I fully support the LSR and have duely signed the petition. It is very short sighted of this council to stifle such a valuable asset as a local heritage railway. Let's hope they listen to the objections and do not go ahead with such a blinkered view. Invest in your local attractions don't destroy them!!!
Regards
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th September 2012, 20:36
27vet's Avatar
27vet 27vet is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: On the Equator, dang hot!
Posts: 553
Images: 84
I signed your petition mate.
__________________
Hindsight is what you see from the guard's van
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th September 2012, 21:51
DSY011's Avatar
DSY011 DSY011 is offline  
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BRISTOL U.K.
Posts: 4,464
Images: 547
I have also signed the petition and posted a comment on the site.
__________________
The Old Git, Syd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th September 2012, 08:21
dave6023's Avatar
dave6023 dave6023 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Poole
Posts: 14
Images: 58
I too have signed and posted a comment. Just hope the petition is successful.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21st September 2012, 20:53
Christopher Dent Christopher Dent is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 88
I have already signed the petiton as have stopped a few times at Launceston on journies west of Launceston and travelled the line in 2009. What I can't understand is how Cornwall CC could pinch land whose future hoped for use is already owned by the railway. The railway to Tresmeer from Launceston opened westward in July 1892 has 120
years precedence. Let's hope the LSR's case prevails.
__________________
60501
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th November 2012, 19:49
penrose penrose is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 7
Many thanks to those members of this forum who previously supported us and objected to Cornwall Council's plans. An update on the situation is as follows:

Cornwall Council withdrew their previous trail Planning Application PA12/07870 for 'technical' reasons. They have now submitted an almost identical application, PA12/10153 (some changes have been made to the surface materials to be used in places, but the plan still obstructs the extension of the railway). The new application can be viewed, and comments made, at http://tinyurl.com/d73gpxd

By submitting a new application, a situation has been created where previous objections to PA12/07870 are no longer valid, and fresh objections will need to be made to the new application, and we would urge all those who have already objected to submit a fresh objection on the Council's website, or re-submit the previous one. Additionally our online petition of objection to the plans, which has received over 1100 signatures, can still be signed via our website and will be submitted as an objection to the new planning application later this month.

As the element to which the vast majority of objections related has not been addressed (the railway's offers of meetings with Cornwall Council have gone unanswered) natural justice would suggest that these original objections should be carried forward. If you feel that this should be the case, we would suggest that you contact Cornwall Council Planning Department, 3-5 Barn Lane, Bodmin, PL31 1LZ Tel: 0300 1234 151 [email protected] direct, or your Member of Parliament.

As and when we have any further news, it will appear on our website.


Charlie O'Mahoney
LSR
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13th November 2012, 15:34
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
I have sent my objections again to the council and hope they listen to reason!
All the best
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18th November 2012, 19:26
27vet's Avatar
27vet 27vet is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: On the Equator, dang hot!
Posts: 553
Images: 84
No worries, I will sign another petition if necessary.
__________________
Hindsight is what you see from the guard's van
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.