23:26

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Passenger Operations and Observations

Maximum DMU Length

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 6th October 2009, 01:02
Scott V Scott V is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 7
Maximum DMU Length

Hi All. I was wondering if anyone can tell me if there is a maximum length on a DMU consist. I have seen 3 and 4 car consists and joined consists but what about forming one that was up to 15 cars long that you could access from one end to the other.
Any thoughts??
Cheers

Scott


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th October 2009, 11:18
John_142's Avatar
John_142 John_142 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 587
Images: 44
DMUs in Passenger Service can run up to 12 cars thats with Trailer Cars (3car units) being used as well I think the maximum with non Trailer (2 acr Units) cars is a total of 9 cars ie. 3x2car units.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th October 2009, 16:24
ccmmick's Avatar
ccmmick ccmmick is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St Austell
Posts: 1,109
Images: 71
The Par to Newquay line used to run 9 car 118 DMUs back in 70s
They also used to take a parcel van on the back of DMUs on the Barnstaple line,
ccmmick
__________________
Sometimes i think to myself
I dont know and other times
I dont know what to think


Last edited by ccmmick; 6th October 2009 at 16:28.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th October 2009, 06:58
Scott V Scott V is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 7
Thanks for the feedback Gents. That's great. Do you happen to know what the limiting factors would be to going longer?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7th October 2009, 08:46
Dave Rowland's Avatar
Dave Rowland Dave Rowland is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gosport, Hants
Posts: 1,064
Images: 45
A general 'rule of thumb' is that, owing to platform lengths at many stations. the maximum length would be 10 cars (2 X 5 car units), or 12 cars (3 X 4 car units); these and other combinations may exceed this, but if you see longer formations, they would more than likely be either: A) failed units being rescued by other unit(s) already in service, or B) empty coaching stock workings, which have no need to call at stations, hence the relaxation of rules. I'm reliably informed by a driver friend that the former accounts for most instances of overlong trains.

Last edited by Dave Rowland; 7th October 2009 at 08:57. Reason: extra info
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7th October 2009, 13:09
John_142's Avatar
John_142 John_142 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 587
Images: 44
Thats very true indeed but yet other issues include cost of runing ie..viable or not viable for a service to be formed of a certain ammount of cariages / units plus the fact that TOCs theesedays like to make as much money as possible and that to save money on running costs at the same time in what ever way they can ie..Arriva are very keen on saving money on fuel by means of encouraging economic driving.

If you take alook the skegness service in the summer and the use of the HST set on this route it is if im right formed of 9 cariages and from my experence of it it is always packed out therefore being viable for EMT to run as is also with the maximum lenghth as notibley this only calls at certain stations en route.

If they where to use say 4x class 158sor 156s making eight cariages and the runing of eight engines which efectivley would cost more money as there is more fuel being used compared to using a HST set with only two engines being used though much bigger engines there is still less fule being consumed therefore viable for EMT to run a HST set and not DMUs on this extra service.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7th October 2009, 23:15
Scott V Scott V is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 7
Thanks so much for that feedback. The reason I ask is that I'm involved in a study that is looking at the replacement of a large loco hauled sleeper & sitter consists of up to 23 carriages with other more modern configurations. The platform length would not be a problem but I'm definately interested in the fuel consumption comments. We have also started to investigate noise issues with DMU's in relation to sleeper. The feedback we have so far is that the new generation DMU's are now much quieter. Any comment on that please?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8th October 2009, 11:09
Axe Axe is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Epsom, Surrey.
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Rowland View Post
A general 'rule of thumb' is that, owing to platform lengths at many stations. the maximum length would be 10 cars (2 X 5 car units), or 12 cars (3 X 4 car units); these and other combinations may exceed this, but if you see longer formations, they would more than likely be either: A) failed units being rescued by other unit(s) already in service, or B) empty coaching stock workings, which have no need to call at stations, hence the relaxation of rules....
In the UK, apart from at unsignalled halts, it is the signalling system that primarily determines the maximum train length that can stop at a station platform.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9th October 2009, 18:00
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott V View Post
Thanks so much for that feedback. The reason I ask is that I'm involved in a study that is looking at the replacement of a large loco hauled sleeper & sitter consists of up to 23 carriages with other more modern configurations. The platform length would not be a problem but I'm definately interested in the fuel consumption comments. We have also started to investigate noise issues with DMU's in relation to sleeper. The feedback we have so far is that the new generation DMU's are now much quieter. Any comment on that please?
The idea of using a DMU for a sleeper service is just evil.

How dare you even consider it!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9th October 2009, 21:09
Pesmo Pesmo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 437
Even the quietest modern DMU's are surprisingly noisey and have a degree of vibration. I remember reading in a magazine that this is one of the reasons that NR here are leaning towards proper power cars for the next generation of Intercity express sets, where the contract to investigate the options was only recently signed. There will be a DMU derivative but I think its going to be for fast commuter routes only, with the longer range and Bi-modal sets having power cars when diesels are used.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.