08:18

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Passenger Operations and Observations

What if...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 29th April 2009, 19:54
ECML43's Avatar
ECML43 ECML43 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Posts: 64
Images: 9
Talking What if...

If you ran a major passenger operating company (or if you'd prefer, a freight one) in the UK, where would you run your trains and what trains would you run. also, what would you be called (and I mean a little more serious than [your name]RAIL!).

Mine would be called SiliSpeed Trains (it's a long story where the 'SiliSpeed' comes from). i would probably run fast trains in and around London. I had an Idea for a fast service between Peterborough and Brighton by use of the Thameslink line and a new connection that is planned to be built between the ECML and the Thameslink line. I would also run long distance trains because there are still so many unused routes in the north.
I was also thinking of a fast serviceon the London Underground linking all the main Termini (I know it wouldn't work with all the timetabling but y'know, What if... ).
As for stock, I would use a set of stock designed by myself. I have the plans minimised on my computer as I am writing this. I have designed a set of High speed trains (don't worry, they're not MUs!), high speed MUs and low speed MUs all my EMUs are Dual voltage for compatibility with the southern.
I'm not actually planning to do this for real so don't criticise my (or anyone elses) ideas because I'm entitled to my own fantasies.

PS if you do actually own a rail company I would be priveliged to talk to you!


__________________
VALENTAS FOREVER!

Last edited by ECML43; 29th April 2009 at 21:15.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th April 2009, 21:14
klordger1900's Avatar
klordger1900 klordger1900 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 732
Images: 27
Over the last 10 years at least there has been talk about a station at Southend Airport and Boreham/Beaulieu (near Chelmsford) so I would plan to build and run a shuttle tram service from Shoeburyness to Stanstead Airport via Shenfield and Witham and call it The Central Essex Shuttle Service or CESS!! You could even use this service as an alternative to getting to London by changing at Stansted Airport.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th April 2009, 21:30
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
I for one would attempt to introduce the concept of high frequency services (every 20 minutes or better, 10 preferably) on lines which are heavily used but currently served by only a few trains an hour, using cheaper tram-like vehicles which means they can be more of them at more frequent intervals but with similar running costs, on current infrastructure with little to no upgrading, in an attempt to compete with the buses where it's not practical to build a tramway nor is it profitable to run a comprehensive traditional railway anymore.

Not exactly a unique idea I grant you but one I sort of like.

I'd name it FQ, after the timetable denotion for frequent service.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th May 2009, 14:48
chrissansome chrissansome is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hinckley
Posts: 7
I'd electrify the Midland Mainline north of Bedford to Nottingham and Sheffield. Then i'd also electrify the line from Sheffield to Doncaster and from Sheffield to where the line joins the Leeds mainline. Then when the HST's need replacing you can order new higher speed electric trains and rid the Meridians to Cross Country as they need more capacity. You could then also extend the Thameslink network north to locations such as Corby or Leicester.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st July 2009, 13:01
ROUGH TOR ROUGH TOR is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: kent
Posts: 181
Images: 73
How about a direct route, built to Continental loading gauge, from , say, Sheffield and/or Manchester to the Channel Tunnel at Dollands Moor?
Passenger trains by day, Freight traffic by night round the clock.
As to a name?
Well, "Great Central Railway" perhaps would fit the bill?
We could even lay a line up the central reservation of every motorway in the Country while we were at it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd July 2009, 13:35
48111 48111 is offline  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 414
Yes

Yes, the GREAT CENTRAL, now that would be good.

48111
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd July 2009, 21:31
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROUGH TOR View Post
How about a direct route, built to Continental loading gauge, from , say, Sheffield and/or Manchester to the Channel Tunnel at Dollands Moor?
I think your idea may not be as fancyful as you think. I believe there are people with access to the corridors of power who have similar ideas!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd July 2009, 18:38
boilersuit's Avatar
boilersuit boilersuit is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moved again! Back in Kent!!
Posts: 1,213
Images: 99
That idea was promoted strongly some years back. A bill has been before parliament a couple of times but it keeps betting kicked out at the committee stage.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central...United_Kingdom)

Last edited by boilersuit; 3rd July 2009 at 18:42.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 6th July 2009, 09:32
ROUGH TOR ROUGH TOR is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: kent
Posts: 181
Images: 73
Indeed.
It could even have a London terminal at, say, Marylebone.
Perhaps a new station at Nottingham too, we could call that one Nottingham Victoria perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9th July 2009, 16:47
P3K P3K is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aberdeen/Perth
Posts: 4
Scottish Freight

How about a trippling of the line from Perth to Inverness (It's still partly single track. The third line would be dedicated to channel tunnel style wagons for roll on roll off lorries. HGV would then be banned from the A9 north of Perth. We'd call ourselves "Lorries are Banned from the A9 Railways.com".............
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.