Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
The Fleet and Maintenance of Diesel Locomotives at Cardiff Canton Freight Depot:
http://www.lococarriage.org.uk/canton.htm Scroll down to bottom for 'Locomotive Examination Frequencies'. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
I think you will find that's exactly what I have tried to say all along on this thread !
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
What I find strange is that they re-engined class 47s and turned them into 57s when they could have used 56s or even 60s. I find it such a waste that fairly new locos are not being used. Class 58 is another example. Surely other companies could use these. Freightliner could use the class 60s. Also I think there are even class 92s in store, WHAT A WASTE!!
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
1 - they would have to buy them off DBSchenker-which would cost money. 2 - If they purchased them they then would have to pay to either give them "F" exams (A vertual rebuild) at £500,000 + per loco or re-engine them which would cost more,its cheaper to lease class 70's ! 3 - They are a loco with a maximum operating speed of 60 mph(100kph) which is no good for freightliner trains which run at 75mph(120kph). |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Well if freightliner don't want them what about Freightliner Heavy Haul for working the heavy infrastructure trains an the cost of the "F" exams would almost be repaid by working longer an heavier trains to recoop the cost sounds like a plan to me an a good 1 at that.
__________________
Phill ![]() |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|
|