08:33

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

New Diesels (or Not) 70012

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 14th January 2011, 22:13
farren's Avatar
farren farren is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: leicester
Posts: 95
Images: 62
as the loco is going to be scraped then all the loco parts are then scrap even if any are usefull they are now seen as scrap and may not be used in a new loco as they are allso seen as second hand they can not be used on a new loco. as you would not bay a new car with second hand bits in it. and if scraped it be comes the insurers loco ie the 1st owner. the only way round this is to not scrap it and then it could be use as spears which would be expensive to say the lest.


__________________
Chaos, Panic, Disorder I see my work here is DONE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15th January 2011, 14:14
colchesterken colchesterken is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: colchester
Posts: 149
written off cars do get rebuilt..it is called reshelling
you put the engine and any usable bits in a new body

many years I purchased a rebuild ( at a good price ) it was MOT d and checked over by the police .. it was a good buy lasted me several yeads and cost 1/2 price

I dont see why with all the expertess they have it could not be rebuilt onto a new chassis
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15th January 2011, 14:20
pre65's Avatar
pre65 pre65 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ashen-North Essex/Suffolk borders.
Posts: 3,560
Images: 93
I bet it's more than just chassis damage.

If the insurance pays up why bother ?
__________________
Philip.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15th January 2011, 18:40
ACE's Avatar
ACE ACE is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Penzance,Cornwall
Posts: 469
Images: 1350
Now that is NOT a good look....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15th January 2011, 20:40
Seabrook Seabrook is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East London
Posts: 101
On YouTube there is film of the wagons carrying the locomotives being shunted at Mountford. Loose shunted by a front loader, definitely not allowed in the UK. Moving valuable cargo in such a slapdash and cheapskate manner, noting the bogies were secured in cradles, maybe the problems had their genesis at the port where they were loaded.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15th January 2011, 21:19
Wakey spotter's Avatar
Wakey spotter Wakey spotter is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South elmsall
Posts: 89
Images: 50
As unfortunate as it is for FLHH the main thing is no one was killed or injured.
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15th January 2011, 22:09
talky-tim talky-tim is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Derby
Posts: 30
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by pre65 View Post
I bet it's more than just chassis damage.

If the insurance pays up why bother ?
Yeah, but will the crane driver (or probably his company) pay the insurance excess and loose their no claims bonuses for the next few years like we would if we wrote our brand new vehicles off without even driving them??

Cheers, Tim
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 16th January 2011, 14:27
Master Cutler's Avatar
Master Cutler Master Cutler is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mansfield Notts
Posts: 511
When you think how much cargo is lost at sea every year to weather and of course pirates, this is small beer for insurance companies. To strip, test and re-certify any potentially useable parts would be prohibitively expensive in labour costs alone.
It's like when my customers send me old equipment back for rebuilding and upgrading, I end up quoting less for a new unit due to the labour costs of stripping the old units down.
So my guess is, loco goes to meet the Rotweiler behind the scrappie's fence.

PS
They could always send it up to Barrow Hill as a conversation or conservation piece.

Last edited by Master Cutler; 16th January 2011 at 14:29. Reason: posted mid flight
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17th January 2011, 02:50
saxokid's Avatar
saxokid saxokid is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wirral
Posts: 438
Images: 171
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mendipman319 View Post
The chassis of 70012 has been bent look at the picture http://martinturner.fotopic.net/p68663398.html
It would be very hard to repair that damage! Must have left quite a dent where it landed!
Thats some damage there!!! bet someone lost there job over that!!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17th January 2011, 03:50
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
According to an article in Railway Herald today (page 4) 70012 is going back across the pond, just waiting for a suitable ship.

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.