| Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
 | Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#11
22nd July 2007, 18:46
|
||||
|
||||
He is completely bonkers.
 But his argument about all railway deaths not being counted in rail ftalities is true though I doubt that if those were taken into account that rail would still be safer. Also how can you exclude cyclist deaths as they are road users.
Last edited by GWR9600; 22nd July 2007 at 18:49. 
|
|
#12
22nd July 2007, 21:06
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think he is trying to say that less people are killed or injured in accidents involving road coaches than trains. That might be true at the moment but I can guarantee that the situation would soon change if, as he suggests, several thousand road coaches start speeding in and out of London during the rush hours every day.
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
|
|
#13
23rd July 2007, 00:12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
23rd July 2007, 22:36
|
||||
|
||||
|
The way its going this week, forget trains and busses.....better investing in boats!
Water......its cheaper than tarmac! R
|
|
#15
25th July 2007, 21:58
|
|||
|
|||
|
There was a discussion about this on the Jeremy Vine show on Radio 2 today, I listened incredulously to a bit then turned it off in anger. These people are morons if they seriously believe this is a plan that would be of any use environmentally or startegically. Idiots.
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
