| Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
 | Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
12th February 2010, 17:50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Demand for 90-minute train times (BBC News)
Business and a county council demand 90-minute journey times on the London to Norwich rail line under a new franchise.
More from BBC News... 
|
|
#2
13th February 2010, 08:40
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree totally about the need for more comfort, reliability etc but is faster speed really that critical to the economic wellbeing of a particular region? If it is achieved what will these high powered businessmen do with the extra 10 or 20 minutes they have gained and who will pay for the undoubted extra costs that that will be incurred due to the investment that will be required?
Surely, the important thing is that the rail journey should be competitive with other forms of transport (ie is the train the quickest journey?) and in cost. I imagine that even at present the answers are "Yes" (except by private jet or helicopter) and "No."
__________________
reflector
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
