Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in my opinion which many people never seem to agree with,the goverment still cant keep there hands off the railway industry even though BRs gone.there just doing it for the money,so if BRs gone why cant the goverment,with them forking in money from a privatised railway,which they do much to nothing for, except buy a train from japan,intead of derby were it should of been made and wasted even more because there doing diffent versions we dont need?whats your opinion?
Last edited by SOUTHEASTERN-465; 9th April 2009 at 13:18. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and let me just say the goverment just invested in the new IEP for 80 million pounds or somthing,but they bought it off a japanese company,usually people buy japenese cars because there cheaper,why did the goverment invest on the japense built train over the derby built where it should of been made in my opinion?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
the only thing the goverment should have to do with the railway is the DFT and tocs should invest on there stuff,not the goverment!
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|