|
I'm getting flak for suggesting this on Railchat.
Mainly because of the inflammatory text on the RMT's own web page. The BBC have done a much better job.
It would seem that initial signs were noted on two days but were not expected to deteriorate significantly before replacement work could be scheduled in the normal manner.
However it is suggested that there were a number of complaints by drivers after the 21st which should have rung alarm bells for Network Rail that the failure was becoming catastrophic.
Last edited by wyvern; 3rd December 2012 at 17:04.
|