View Single Post
  #8  
Old 16th April 2008, 07:47
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foghut View Post
Are you suggesting that the MML Class 170s had good acceleration ?

That certainly wasn't my experience. Pulling out of Luton in either direction our 319s left them standing - they seemed little better than HSTs....
I have to agree with Foghut here, 170s are pants at acceleration, so much so that my sister, who knows nothing about trains, commented, at the time, that 'those new trains are slow, my train [2x319] overtook one at Elstree [northbound]'. Ofcourse there is no accounting for signals, but given that the 170 would have left STP before her train left KXTL there would have to be an 08 in front of it!

Why MML ever selected those units I will never know, and then to pick a slightly longer 222, with fewer seats per coach, the mind boggles.
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote