View Single Post
  #2  
Old 22nd October 2007, 18:30
Foghut's Avatar
Foghut Foghut is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
Why is it that most TOCs can't have a few locomotive engines to use in this sort of situation. If they did it would probably reduce the number of cancellations due to faults with trains as well?
The sad fact is that nowadays, running a railway is about generating money and not about providing a transport service. Just look at the phenomenal amounts that franchisees are paying into the treasury. Train passengers in the UK are really just paying another stealth tax, which is why we have some of the highest fares in Europe.

Thus it figures that it costs a TOC far less to cancel the odd service rather than permanently hire a 'Thunderbird' which is not often used (plus the incurred costs of driver training/traction refreshing).

There are exceptions to this but they tend to be the prestigiuos TOCs rather than the everyday ones; eg GNER keeps a 67 in readiness at KX.
__________________
Bricklayers Arms Depot -...http://www.trainweb.org/bricklayersarms/
Reply With Quote