Railway Forum

Railway Forum (https://www.railwayforum.net/index.php)
-   Diesel & Electric Discussion (https://www.railwayforum.net/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Class 142 to be Named (https://www.railwayforum.net/showthread.php?t=10130)

LNER 3rd October 2011 18:10

Class 142 to be Named
 
I understand that a class 142 is to be named 'Timothy Hackworth' at Darlington at 10.00 22nd October. Has anyother member any information please?
Thanks

The Crab 4th October 2011 07:25

What an insult to Timothy hackworth!

62440 4th October 2011 16:26

I thought that too.

Regards, 62440.

Tony 4th October 2011 17:17

I thought that the 142's were already named - but not with ones that can be mentioned in polite company!

John H-T 4th October 2011 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Crab (Post 64155)
What an insult to Timothy hackworth!

You and 62240 got in before me. The whole idea beggars belief.

What bright spark came up with this one?

Best wishes,

John H-T.

Bubblewrap 5th October 2011 07:02

Which coach?:confused:
Or is one coach going to be Called Timothy & the other Hackworth.
If other 142s are named & then "split" we could have some amusing combinations!:eek::p

swisstrains 5th October 2011 10:45

I think a Class 142 is an excellent choice. It illustrates just how little some trains have changed over the years.
I'm sure Mr. Hackworth would instantly recognise the similarites between the 142 and some of the early coaches used on the Stockton & Darlington Railway.;)

John H-T 5th October 2011 15:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by swisstrains (Post 64174)
I think a Class 142 is an excellent choice. It illustrates just how little some trains have changed over the years.
I'm sure Mr. Hackworth would instantly recognise the similarites between the 142 and some of the early coaches used on the Stockton & Darlington Railway.;)

Fair point John. About the only difference, apart from the I.C.E., is that the 142 has a roof!

Best wishes,

John H-T.

swisstrains 5th October 2011 21:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by John H-T (Post 64184)
Fair point John. About the only difference, apart from the I.C.E., is that the 142 has a roof!

Best wishes,

John H-T.

Very true John.
Although, judging by the amount of water that can often be found inside a 142, even that is debatable.:D

ACE 6th October 2011 20:24

The weight of the plate will probably make the unit topple over, i would personally call it 'BR's Cheapest and Nastiest'


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:28.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.