hstudent |
20th March 2008 10:24 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by swisstrains
(Post 14517)
The more I read about the project the more I'm convinced that this is simply an exercise to find a suitable replacement for "Pacers" and the likes.
I think that the DfT have looked at the proven tram-train technology in mainland Europe and recognised a cost effective way of replacing our old trains without having to go to the expense of a totally new build. Unlike most tram-trains, which usually have some electrical capability, the British ones will be 100% diesel powered and although technically still tram-trains I doubt if the ability to run over city centre tram lines is very high on their list of priorities.
|
The main advantages of Pacer trains over trams are a toilet and luggage and cycle space. Will tram-trains have these?
I doubt most stations between Sheffield and Huddersfield will have toilets and the trains are one per hour, it could potentially be a long wait for the toilet especially if a train's cancelled.
The fact that there are 3 universities along the line and many rural stations probably would mean a lot of luggage and bikes are carried on that line, although that's just what I think not what I know happens.
It'll be interesting to see if Northern want to use tram-trains on services which won't go in to cities with trams (Manchester, Sheffield) or plans for trams in the future (Liverpool, Leeds, York). It will also be interesting to see if other companies look at tram-trains such as East Midlands Trains, who serve Nottingham with newer trains.
|