Who needs High Speed 2?
 

Seen today on Rail-News.com:

On the 20th August the 07.30 Birmingham to London Euston Virgin Pendolino service completed its journey in just 66 1/2 minutes. This is thought to be the quickest VT journey between the 2 cities.

Virgin Trains told the Rail Media Group : ” This was not planned and the train just had a good run between Birmingham and London”


Assuming this run was from New Street, not International, I make that an average of a shade over 102mph for the 113.25 miles. It reminds me of a journey I had from Liverpool a few months ago when an afternoon Saturday train I was on was run as a non-stop relief from Liverpool to Euston following earlier disruption caused by a lineside fire. Our average was just a shade under 100mph including a signal stop near Runcorn.

Whatever their shortcomings in the creature comforts department, those Pendolinos can't half burn the miles...

hs2
 

Just shows what can be achieved why waste all the millions on a new line when the OLD can achieve this.I wonder if HS1 is just a fashion statement all be it an expensive one.The route of the line will destroy so many communities all for a 15minutes saving .If thewcml can work well it will make this abomination unnesecary.

What you're forgetting is the line hasn't got the capacity to sustain this running. It's technically possible to do it once under the right circumstances but not practical to do it 4 times an hour every day of the year.

That's why we need new lines.

HS 1 is the line between St Pancras & the Channel Tunnel. Do you mean HS 2?

Regards, 62440.

Look, I know I am old fashioned and I "witter" on about when I worked on the railway, and I used to be quite happy "plodding" along the slow line.

But them trains going so fast, I hear fast trains every day of the week going through Bletchley, they are going very fast and some of the Locos sound like aeroplanes. But apart from the modern way of life, where everybody is in a rush and want things done "yesterday", why speed ? Why on earth does the modern railway want to go faster ?
If ever one of those Virgin cornettos or what ever they are called was going as fast as I hear them and something happened people on the train would not stand a chance of surviving it would be a disaster of the same thing as a aeroplane crash.

Surely service is better than speed, nice clean comfortable trains, that leave "A" on time and arrive at "B" on time, that is it is it not ?

It is all very well travelling at very high speed up there in the sky, but to put machinery on metal rails and send it along at very high speed well that is playing with fate. God forbid that there should ever be another high speed train crash, we hope and pray not, but it cannot be gauranteed, nothing is certain when it comes to transporting flesh and blood encased in machinery travelling at high speed. The human body was not designed to withstand impacts of any sort at those speeds.

Good everyday dependable service is all that should be required.
The train departs on time and is comfortable and clean and arrives at its destination on time with happy and relaxed passengers and indeed traincrew.

You dont need to go fast, you still get there just the same.

48111

The need for speed has always been at the heart of the railway. There will always be services that don't require extreme speed, but at it's core, the entire idea behind a railway from day 1 was to get from A to B quicker than before. That's why they were invented, that's why they continue to get faster.

There have always been skeptics of speed, when the steam locomotive was first invented, a peer commented, 30MPH, heads will be torn from bodies, people disembowled, the human body was not designed to travel as such velocities! It is unnatural Sir, unnatural!

And yet here we are. Also, a Pendolino has already had a major accident at speed, and due to modern safety technologies, the only fatility was one 80 year old woman, infact for the accident it was, the ammount of people who not only survived, but got out with zero to minor injuries, was remarkable.

It's far safer to travel in a Pendolino at 140+MPH than in a Mk1 or Mk2 at 50, or a Mk3 / Mk4 at 100+, and that's no lie.

I'd say sadly not. People need to get in, out and between the urban centres as quickly as humanly possible. If it's comfortable, that's great, but it needs to be quick. If it was like a palace but took longer to get there, then nobody would travel.

All people today want is to get to work quicker or travel between offices in different cities, and as long as they have a socket for their laptop and a cup of coffee, they're happy.

It's the pressures of modern society.

To be honest, I would suggest flying is tempting fate much more than traveling fast along the ground. I've already gone over the Pendolino and modern crash-worthiness but aircaft defy gravity - regardless of any safety feature, a plane crash is always going to be fatal. Statistically, railways are still a far safer way to travel than by aircraft, if you take into account the number of incidents in relation to journeys made.

Unfortunately, I don't think that is enough for todays society. But as I say, I'm not entirely sure it ever was. It is on commuter branchlines I suppose, but for intercity travel, the crux has always been, how fast can we go?

Mallard holds the steam speed record for a reason, and at the height of the Steam days, it was all about who could get you from London to Scotland the quickest. A lot of that was marketing but it was all about the appeal that railways were the quickest way to get from A to B, and as I say, that is the very reason they exist. It's their Raison D'etre, their reason for existing at all.

Know what you mean, though I think the Pendolinos are pretty safe in a crash. I had to go up to Birmingham International from Euston the other day and took one of the trains that is being operated by a class 90 and mk3 carriages. We were 'only' doing 110mph of course, but it was so nice to go back to comfy seats, big tables and windows you can see out of properly. Most of the time on train journeys these days I need to work and the odd ones don't it's nice to catch up with reading, sleep etc. Maybe it's a sign of old age but these days I find those things more important than getting from A to B in the shortest possible time. If we ever do get High Speed 2 there'll hardly be time to go to the buffet between London and Birmingham.

Well I honestly beleive that I am getting too old for this forum, a lot of discussions are centred on the modern railway and I will be the first to admit I know very little about this private lot and dont really want to.

Time to think about things I think.

48111

Chill out Peter old mate. We live in an ever changing world, and it's the same for all of us. Nothing stays the same for long these days, and change does not always seem to be for the better but we have to adapt to things whether we like it or not.

You have a million treasured memories of how things were, and I (for one) am mighty glad when you share them with us.

why dont you try a 91 from kings cross to doncaster 156miles in 80 mins:)