Railway Forum

Railway Forum (https://www.railwayforum.net/index.php)
-   Railway News from around the World (https://www.railwayforum.net/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Don't free Ronnie Biggs (https://www.railwayforum.net/showthread.php?t=4472)

John Hunt 13th April 2009 07:10

Don't free Ronnie Biggs
 
http://u.tv/News/Dont-free-Ronnie-Bi...3-40feb3ea6a4d

Arthur Maunsell 13th April 2009 07:56

whilst I agree with those sentiments in principle, he is an old ill man and some consideration has to be given to that. Let the Authorities who have all the info and experiance decide.

Gandalf 13th April 2009 09:21

At last a reference to Jack Mills,
He never enjoyed much in the way of life after the robbery unlike others and I am not convinced his early death was not connected with the beating they gave him so as far as I am concerned let Biggs rot in jail as he has no sympathy from me.
End of rant.
John (G)

chuffchuff 13th April 2009 13:13

Wot he said /\ /\ /\

If that piece of scum hadn't run away he'd be out now ( rant off)

LesG 13th April 2009 15:48

My opinion,

LET HIM ROT where he is!!

Les

SOUTHEASTERN-465 13th April 2009 17:48

ive got to disagree,
free the poor man,the worst he could do is excrement he self in public,and if the youth of today done what he done all they would do is let them out on bail and give them a second chance,aslong as the loco wasnt hurt i could not care at all and i couldnt care what anyone else thinks

berwickspotter 13th April 2009 19:32

let the scum rot in jail for what he done to that poor driver
I hope and pray that his last days are behind bars
and that the low life is never free

Bubblewrap 13th April 2009 20:04

The great train robbery was in 1963 that was 46 years ago(nearly half a century)
The long sentences were handed down because it was a Royal Mail train.
While the crime was bad the attack on the train driver was an assault.
Far worse crimes have been committed since with lesser sentences handed down by the courts.
Are some of the anti Briggs sentiments due to the fact that the man assaulted was a train driver?
The man has done a fair portion of his sentence & is very ill why not release into a bail hostel?

Bubblewrap 13th April 2009 20:25

Read this Ronnie Brigs took part alright but he was not the one who carried out the assault.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Train_Robbery_(1963)

berwickspotter 13th April 2009 23:09

no matter who done it. if you cant do the time dont do the crime
if you rob a train or take part in beating up someone it is still breaking the law
so long may he be behind bars I REST MY CASE

Arthur Maunsell 14th April 2009 07:29

the point being if he DIDNT beat up the guy, all he did was rob the train....

it was the crime of the century at the time but small beer by todays standards...the sentances were always too harsh, designed as a deterrant to anyone else doing it again ...25 years to life for the equivalent of holding up a post office?

richard thompson 14th April 2009 07:35

I think he should be let free, then deported back to Argentinia where he will be free and not costing us lots of money and not where he wants to be.
Richard

Bubblewrap 14th April 2009 08:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by richard thompson (Post 26694)
I think he should be let free, then deported back to Argentinia where he will be free and not costing us lots of money and not where he wants to be.
Richard

Don't you mean Brazil?
How can you deport him? he was born here!
If released into a bail hostel an eye can be kept on him.
At his age I don't think it likely he will re-offend.
People have been given less for murder.
I don't think keeping him in jail will serve any purpose.

pavorossi 14th April 2009 09:31

The way I see it he comitted a crime, he was found guilty and sentenced by a court of law, and now he ought to serve the full sentence, irregardless of his age.

berwickspotter 14th April 2009 11:23

Well said pavorossi could not have put it better myself

LesG 14th April 2009 16:21

The only reason that Biggs came back to the UK as far as i can see is,

He was running out of money,he was ill and wanted the use of the National Health Sevice for whitch he had paid no NI contributions because he had been in Brazil for all those years since his escape.

He did the crime, just because he was out of the country for most of the sentence does not mean he should get off light now he has come back, let him finnish his sentance as passed down by a jury of his peers.

I personnally do not care how old or frail this criminal is, he can rot where he is.

My opinion again Les

SOUTHEASTERN-465 14th April 2009 17:00

changed my mind
 
ive thought about this now,
and i think he should spend the rest of his life in a cell,if he would of served his time in the begining he wouldnt have to face the music he has to today,and if he knew coming back to britain would get him a space in jail why did he even come back in the begining and personally i think now,if he wants to go back to brazil he can stay there in one of there wrotting crappy jails,but the only thing for it now is to let him serve the sentance on a basis that how long he escaped prison he should serve inside,no-one should have sypaphy for him if you do somthing like this you got to do your time no fooling around with it either!

Arthur Maunsell 14th April 2009 18:50

2000 years ago or so a very wise man said (to paraphrase) that we should turn the other cheek if someone struck us....that would be the Humane and Christian thing to do in this case.

(By the way I'm an Atheist but it doesnt make it any less true)

John Hunt 24th April 2009 06:56

Update -

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news..._on_parole.php


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.