22:19

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > News and General Discussion > Railway News from around the World

All for the roads again

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 16th July 2008, 19:49
DSY011's Avatar
DSY011 DSY011 is offline  
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BRISTOL U.K.
Posts: 4,464
Images: 547
All for the roads again

Will the powers that be never learn? Just think what that money could do in taking cars and even more so trucks off the roads. This way they will only encourage more onto the roads. I think all loads of more than 80 miles should go by goods train, and the Royal Mail should also be returned to the rails.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20...s-6323e80.html


__________________
The Old Git, Syd
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th July 2008, 19:55
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
Well tolling isn't going to go down well with drivers, and possibly make some of them turn to public transport.

It's the public as well though, lets face it. Here in Manchester the GMPTE/A have the princeable backing and funding to extend Metrolink to several cities, build several interchanges, revolutionise the bus network for the whole of Greater Manchester, introduce 80+ brand new trams, a brand new smartcard system similar to Oyster and most noteworthy is to increase the number of trains running in Manchester, with more capacity and more carrages.

The problem is this will be funded by a congestion charge, that is only £2 a day, only during peak times, during only the weekdays.

And of course the selfish millions who drive into the city every day in suits and four empty seats are like "loooolz no wai i want 2 pay 4 congestion chargings" so I fear the plan might just be scrapped.

I've made myself vocal in all possible ways supporting the new changes though, so hopefully good things might happen.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th July 2008, 20:20
Gandalf's Avatar
Gandalf Gandalf is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sawtry
Posts: 683
Images: 32
Syd,
I always thought that the transport act from way back that created both the nationalised railways and the equivalent road service did state quite plainly that goods needing to travel more than 100 miles had to be offered to the railways first and later to road haulage.
Always seemed a bit odd to have a rail system and then create a competing road haulage organisation.
Has that act ever been repealed?
John (G)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th July 2008, 22:02
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
Syd,
I always thought that the transport act from way back that created both the nationalised railways and the equivalent road service did state quite plainly that goods needing to travel more than 100 miles had to be offered to the railways first and later to road haulage.
Always seemed a bit odd to have a rail system and then create a competing road haulage organisation.
Has that act ever been repealed?
John (G)
John, I believe the railways were officially relieved of their "Common Carrier" status in 1968.
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th July 2008, 19:59
Shed Cat's Avatar
Shed Cat Shed Cat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 1,100
Images: 46
I dont agree that compulsion is the way to go, Syd. I would like to see much more investment in railways (billions and billions of pounds) for whole new new lines, new stations, new freight depots etc so that we achieve Continental quailty of fast clean efficient railways that make going by road uncompetitative and unpleasant in comparison.

This should be funded from existing tax money diverted from other transport-y things e.g. airfairs, cars, speed cameras, and even railways fares themselves rather than this money dissappearing into the central govt tax black hole
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:19.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.