14:53

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

Why does DB Shenker want to scrap class 60's

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 24th February 2010, 20:01
Rassy's Avatar
Rassy Rassy is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Posts: 37
The Fleet and Maintenance of Diesel Locomotives at Cardiff Canton Freight Depot:

http://www.lococarriage.org.uk/canton.htm

Scroll down to bottom for 'Locomotive Examination Frequencies'.


Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 25th February 2010, 10:17
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Thanks Rassy. So it looks like a F exam is about the same as a steam heavy general or in modern terms the 10 year overhaul linked to the boiler certificate.

Best wishes,

John H-T.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 25th February 2010, 14:05
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
Thanks for that, I can stop looking through back numbers of Rail magazine now!

Cheers, 62440.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 25th February 2010, 15:35
21Aman's Avatar
21Aman 21Aman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: birmingham
Posts: 251
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by John H-T View Post
Thanks Rassy. So it looks like a F exam is about the same as a steam heavy general or in modern terms the 10 year overhaul linked to the boiler certificate.

Best wishes,

John H-T.
I think you will find that's exactly what I have tried to say all along on this thread !
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 25th February 2010, 19:07
jonty14 jonty14 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rottweil Germany
Posts: 26
Images: 1
What I find strange is that they re-engined class 47s and turned them into 57s when they could have used 56s or even 60s. I find it such a waste that fairly new locos are not being used. Class 58 is another example. Surely other companies could use these. Freightliner could use the class 60s. Also I think there are even class 92s in store, WHAT A WASTE!!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 25th February 2010, 19:12
Anon Mouse's Avatar
Anon Mouse Anon Mouse is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Shields
Posts: 321
Images: 47
Or even withdraw the 56's used abroad and relace them with more modern and powerful 60's?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 25th February 2010, 20:04
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by 21Aman View Post
I think you will find that's exactly what I have tried to say all along on this thread !
Sorry 21Aman. It is just me being thick!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 26th February 2010, 00:02
21Aman's Avatar
21Aman 21Aman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: birmingham
Posts: 251
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonty14 View Post
Freightliner could use the class 60s. Also I think there are even class 92s in store, WHAT A WASTE!!
Freightliner would not be interested in class 60's for several reasons:-
1 - they would have to buy them off DBSchenker-which would cost money.
2 - If they purchased them they then would have to pay to either give them "F" exams (A vertual rebuild) at £500,000 + per loco or re-engine them which would cost more,its cheaper to lease class 70's !
3 - They are a loco with a maximum operating speed of 60 mph(100kph) which is no good for freightliner trains which run at 75mph(120kph).
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 3rd March 2010, 21:51
lnwr20's Avatar
lnwr20 lnwr20 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crewe, Cheshire, UK
Posts: 142
Images: 90
Well if freightliner don't want them what about Freightliner Heavy Haul for working the heavy infrastructure trains an the cost of the "F" exams would almost be repaid by working longer an heavier trains to recoop the cost sounds like a plan to me an a good 1 at that.
__________________
Phill LNWR Society Member, Class 60 Group Member. Rail Riders Member & Member os Wrenbury & District Model Railway Group
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 4th March 2010, 15:54
21Aman's Avatar
21Aman 21Aman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: birmingham
Posts: 251
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by lnwr20 View Post
Well if freightliner don't want them what about Freightliner Heavy Haul for working the heavy infrastructure trains an the cost of the "F" exams would almost be repaid by working longer an heavier trains to recoop the cost sounds like a plan to me an a good 1 at that.
Its a non-starter mate !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.