21:32

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > News and General Discussion > Railway News from around the World

Channel Tunnel Fire

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 12th September 2008, 22:53
tonyharker tonyharker is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blandford Forum
Posts: 122
"Investigators are likely to examine the presence of a lorry carrying highly flammable carbolic acid, or phenol, which it is claimed overturned before the blast."

How can a lorry overturn in a freight wagon (caged) when the train is going more or less in a straight line??

Tony.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12th September 2008, 23:04
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyharker View Post
..............How can a lorry overturn in a freight wagon (caged) when the train is going more or less in a straight line??

Tony.
I agree Tony.
Some of the HGV's on the Swiss Piggyback trains bounce around quite a bit when going over pointwork but they don't overturn.

Perhaps the rail vehicle suffered a catastrophic failure and the whole lot toppled over?
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13th September 2008, 01:00
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
Wouldn't that have likely derailed the train, or uncoupled the car from the rest of the train at the very least?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 13th September 2008, 07:49
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathbyteacup View Post
Wouldn't that have likely derailed the train, or uncoupled the car from the rest of the train at the very least?
Who's to say that it didn't?.......... that could be why the train was brought to a halt.
The media seem to have very little factual information and most reports are pure speculation or based on "eye-witness" reports from lorry drivers whose view of the incident would have been very restricted in any case. Once the investigators get to work we will probably start to discover some of the facts.
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 13th September 2008, 08:42
locojoe's Avatar
locojoe locojoe is offline  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London England
Posts: 951
Images: 47
Channel Tunnel Reopens

Channel Tunnel Reopens.

http://fyad.org/w5zd
__________________
locojoe
When I read about the evils of drink I gave up reading
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 13th September 2008, 10:02
domeyhead domeyhead is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Locks Heath
Posts: 14
Am I the only one who finds this fire massively suspicious? The same apparent cause as last time in more or less the same circumstances. Correct me if I'm wrong but this lorry with apparently red hot brakes was loaded onto a lorry shuttle up to an hour before departure after waiting around for departure for even longer, but after all that cooling time it manages to reignite only when safely in the tunnel. I don't believe even a red hot wheel will stay at flammable temperature for that long! And there was no smell or smoke at all before departure - doesn't that all sound beyond the realms of "normal" probability? Jacques Gounon has rejected this apparent explanation and I agree with him. The tunnel is now an economic success. Who stands to gain from its economic sabotage?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 13th September 2008, 11:04
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
Quote:
Who's to say that it didn't?..........
Because a derailment at speed that resulted in the toppling of one car would probably result in the toppling of others, probably the majority of the train, and if anyone did survive *that* to tell the story they'd certainly have noticed. If the train derailed to such a degree as for any part of it to turn onto it's side then no doubt that would have been reported by now.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 13th September 2008, 19:45
43006 43006 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 53
Images: 20
I remember the 1996 fire, when a lorry loaded with (I think) expanded polystyrene chips caught fire. The policy at the time was "if you catch fire, keep going in the same direction PDQ" but the train driver ignored this and stopped. I later heard that £200,000,000 worth of damage was done, but I find this hard to believe. I reckon the principle damage will be to OHLE and signalling wires.
Swiss Trains - if you do manage to get on the Eurostar, I can tell you it's quick (St. Pancras to Cheriton in about 30 mins!) and it's smooth. I didn't think much of the seats - my bum went numb on 2 occasions, but there's a lot of it!!!!!!!!!!! The tunnel itself is nothing to write home about.

43006
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 13th September 2008, 21:50
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathbyteacup View Post
Because a derailment at speed that resulted in the toppling of one car would probably result in the toppling of others, probably the majority of the train, and if anyone did survive *that* to tell the story they'd certainly have noticed. If the train derailed to such a degree as for any part of it to turn onto it's side then no doubt that would have been reported by now.
If you say so.
I was simply trying to create a scenario in which someone might have got the impression that the lorry had overturned.
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery

Last edited by swisstrains; 13th September 2008 at 22:17.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 15th September 2008, 23:51
bramleyman bramleyman is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 928
Images: 2
Anything of this nature should NEVER in a month of Sunday's be allowed through such a confined space. WHERE were the so-called H&S 'Experts' to allow this to pass through? WHOEVER GAVE THE OKAY FOR THIS TO GO THROUGH THE TUNNEL SHOULD BE BL**DY WELL SACKED AND IMMEDIATELY, NO MATTER WHAT SIDE OF THE CHANNEL.
__________________
I wouldn't say I am old, but when I was a youngster, the Dead Sea was still alive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.