00:15

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Passenger Operations and Observations

Changes needed to passengers charters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 3rd March 2008, 11:05
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Changes needed to passengers charters

I think there are a few things in passenger's charters which need to be changed or added, such as:

* A standard fixed compensation for delays across all TOCs. Maybe 30 minutes delay entitles you to compensation vouchers to 50% of a single ticket or 25% of a return, 60 minutes to 100%/50%, 120 minutes to a full refund.

Currently Merseyrail only offer 20% on an hour or more despite operating a frequent local service, yet Transpennine Express offer 50%/25% on long distance routes. That should also mean that less passengers miss out on compensation that they are entitled to.

Also TOCs shouldn't be able to say 'if you were told of the delay/cancellation before you bought your ticket then you are not entitled to compensation' as delays and cancellations are an inconveince whenever you're told of them.

* If a train is too crowded to carry all the people who wish to travel on a journey then anyone who is delayed as a result of that should be entitled to compensation at the same rate. Also if a train leaves a station early due to the conductor's poor time keeping (that has happened on Northern Rail services where there is recovery time at certain services and request stops can be missed out, also making a train early.)


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th March 2008, 14:15
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Images: 6
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
I think there are a few things in passenger's charters which need to be changed or added, such as:......

......Currently Merseyrail only offer 20% on an hour or more despite operating a frequent local service, yet Transpennine Express offer 50%/25% on long distance routes. That should also mean that less passengers miss out on compensation that they are entitled to.....
I got 100% on my hour delay last time I used FTPE

Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
.....Also TOCs shouldn't be able to say 'if you were told of the delay/cancellation before you bought your ticket then you are not entitled to compensation' as delays and cancellations are an inconveince whenever you're told of them.....
this is dodgy ground at the best of times. the reason they say this, is that although you may have to wait longer, it is still your choice to travel on the service.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
....* If a train is too crowded to carry all the people who wish to travel on a journey then anyone who is delayed as a result of that should be entitled to compensation at the same rate. Also if a train leaves a station early due to the conductor's poor time keeping (that has happened on Northern Rail services where there is recovery time at certain services and request stops can be missed out, also making a train early.)
how do you prove it is overcrowded? or that as a result you had to wait? trains leaving early are quite rare in the grand scheme of things and you are expected to be on the platform in good time for your train, even then how do you prove it was early?

I know where your coming from but some of that is just unworkable
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19th March 2008, 00:03
robbo's Avatar
robbo robbo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Great Harwood, Lancashire
Posts: 1,101
Images: 664
What happens if due to the delay you miss your / connection, flight and hence missed planned holiday abroad etc due to the delay . Should compensation for that be included as well?
__________________
Have a look at
http://www.steamingnorth.com/
for lots more pictures
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th March 2008, 07:49
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Images: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbo View Post
What happens if due to the delay you miss your / connection, flight and hence missed planned holiday abroad etc due to the delay . Should compensation for that be included as well?
usual protocol would apply because planes are planes and trains are trains. and the planes would doubtless say you should have allowed more time to travel.

The real issue here is infact that people are in too much of a rush to get from a to b to c and back. they are too eager to get a train between 0730 and 0731 to go on a half hour journey in which they must arrive by 0800!
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th March 2008, 11:42
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
I got 100% on my hour delay last time I used FTPE
TPE offer 50% of a single (25% of a return) on 30 minutes delay and 100% of a single (50% of a return) on 60 minutes delay.

Quote:
this is dodgy ground at the best of times. the reason they say this, is that although you may have to wait longer, it is still your choice to travel on the service.
If you have to be somewhere for a certain time, you will be inconveinced because of a delay or cancellation whenever you're told of it.

Quote:
how do you prove it is overcrowded? or that as a result you had to wait? trains leaving early are quite rare in the grand scheme of things and you are expected to be on the platform in good time for your train, even then how do you prove it was early?

I know where your coming from but some of that is just unworkable
Someone who turns up at for a train at a station and finds the previous train was servely delayed or cancelled can just as easily claim that they arrived in time for the previous service. (In the national press someone got a criminal record for finding out which trains were late and then claiming they were on them all. They got found out because they claimed to be on two trains at the same time!)

The conductor could record that the train left people behind at a certain station, so it's on the company's records that people should get compensation.

Last edited by hstudent; 20th March 2008 at 11:47.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th March 2008, 11:53
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbo View Post
What happens if due to the delay you miss your / connection, flight and hence missed planned holiday abroad etc due to the delay . Should compensation for that be included as well?
No TOC would offer compensation for that. All I'm suggetsing is consistency. If a TOC uses a train that is too small to hold all the passengers wishing to travel on it then they are delayed for 60 minutes as a result of it, then they are delayed as a fault of "the railways", the same as a cancelled or delayed train.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20th March 2008, 12:03
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Images: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
If you have to be somewhere for a certain time, you will be inconveinced because of a delay or cancellation whenever you're told of.
true, I can't disagree but that doesn't affect your choice to travel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
Someone who turns up at for a train at a station and finds the previous train was servely delayed or cancelled can just as easily claim that they arrived in time for the previous service.
The time and date of purchase is now printed on all tickets, but assuming you bought the ticket before hand, it is fraud, pure and simple.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
The conductor could record that the train left people behind at a certain station, so it's on the company's records that people should get compensation.
As if he/she hasn't enough to do on a train that busy, I suppose he/she will take down names and addresses just to be sure!! Face it, it's unworkable.
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20th March 2008, 13:09
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
The time and date of purchase is now printed on all tickets, but assuming you bought the ticket before hand, it is fraud, pure and simple.
Only applies for the outward part of a return ticket, a saver or open return may not even state the day you travelled on.


Quote:
As if he/she hasn't enough to do on a train that busy, I suppose he/she will take down names and addresses just to be sure!! Face it, it's unworkable.
I meant they just note that people who wanted to board got left behind. In my opinion TOCs must be aware if trains are too full for everyone to fit on so they can address the issue.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20th March 2008, 13:24
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Images: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
Only applies for the outward part of a return ticket, a saver or open return may not even state the day you travelled on.
Hence the assuming you bought your ticket before hand bit.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
I meant they just note that people who wanted to board got left behind. In my opinion TOCs must be aware if trains are too full for everyone to fit on so they can address the issue.
But in order for people to be compensated, the number of people left behind would not be enough. It would only serve as an indicator of how busy that particular service was, it could not take into account normal loadings, as services were delayed or even cancelled.

Imagine I arrive at a station to board my train, which is delayed, I see the previous train leaving filled to the brim and ten people left behind. I decide to claim I was getting that service along with the ten people who were actually left behind. If the company decides to pay out based on the conductors report, who do they compensate?

You can't expect a company to pay to anyone who claims based on a conductor saying it was full but ignoring the numbers involved, particularly if the next train, by any operator, is within an hour.
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th March 2008, 13:57
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
Hence the assuming you bought your ticket before hand bit.




But in order for people to be compensated, the number of people left behind would not be enough. It would only serve as an indicator of how busy that particular service was, it could not take into account normal loadings, as services were delayed or even cancelled.

Imagine I arrive at a station to board my train, which is delayed, I see the previous train leaving filled to the brim and ten people left behind. I decide to claim I was getting that service along with the ten people who were actually left behind. If the company decides to pay out based on the conductors report, who do they compensate?

You can't expect a company to pay to anyone who claims based on a conductor saying it was full but ignoring the numbers involved, particularly if the next train, by any operator, is within an hour.
The point I'm trying to make is that, while any new compensation scheme that I suggested is open to abuse, the current delay/cancellation compensation arrangement is also open to abuse. Any way of trying to totally prevent any abuse would not work at small unstaffed stations. But why should anyone have to wait on a platform for an hour for the next train, when they arrived in time for the previous train and not be compensated for it?

You mentioned the next train may be a different operator. That's precisely why consistency is needed in passenger's charters. If an East Midlands Train service between Manchester and Sheffield is cancelled and you have to catch a TP Express one half an hour later, you won't get any compensation. If it was the TP Express train that was cancelled then you would get compensation.

You also need to remember that TOCs promise to offer compensation for someone who made a seat reservation and had to stand. That could create more complications than my suggestion. If someone claimed that someone else was sat in their seat and the conductor did not make his or her way through the train, what would happen then?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.