View Single Post
  #18  
Old 7th September 2010, 15:15
catswhiskers catswhiskers is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony View Post
All that HS2 would achieve is a faster journey from A to B. If you add C and D as stops, most of the time saving dissappears. In our crowded island, the extra stops would be needed.
If a Pendolino carries 500 passengers, six trains per hour (on a single track) gives a maximum of 3000 passengers per hour. On HS2, headways would have to be longer and I don't think any more than 3000 passengers per hour would be possible.
To achieve very little, HS2 would cost at least £20billion at todays prices. Given that it would take at least 10 years to be up and running, the final bill would be upwards of £50 billion and counting.
Reading this thread with interest, one thing I can't get my head round is this. Are there really around 30,000+ people a day wanting / needing to travel in either direction? If so, why.
I am a big fan of the railways but I still don't think we need HS2. Probably just a change of mindset.

Mick
Reply With Quote